A recent study by the US Justice Department notes that households headed by individuals between the ages of 18 and 24 are the most likely to experience identity theft. The report does not investigate why this age group is more susceptible, so I've started a list:
I'm sure there are many more contributing factors. What interests me is determining the appropriate role of the university in helping to prevent identity theft among this age group. Most colleges and universities now engage in information security awareness and training initiatives with the goal of protecting the university's infrastructure and the privacy of information covered by regulations such as FERPA, HIPPA, and so on. Should higher education institutions extend infosec awareness campaigns so that they deal with issues of personal privacy protection and identity theft? What are the benefits to universities? What are their responsibilities to their students?
For educational organizations interested in educating students about the risks of identity theft, the U.S. Department of Education has a website devoted to the topic as does EDUCAUSE.
The results are in from the EDUCAUSE Security Task Force's Computer Security Awareness Video Contest. Topics covered include spyware, phishing, and patching. The winning video, Superhighway Safety, uses a simple running metaphor, a steady beat, and stark visual effects to concisely convey the dangers to online computing as well as the steps one can take to protect his or her computer and personal information.
The videos are available for educational, noncommercial use, provided that each is identified as being a winning entry in the contest. In addition to being great educational/awareness tools, they should serve as inspiration for K-12 schools as well as colleges and universities.
In a prepared statement, Winnebago County State's Attorney Paul Logli said, "With the increasing use of wireless computer equipment, the people of Winnebago County need to know that their computer systems are at risk. They need to use encryption or what are known as firewalls to protect their data, much the same way locks protect their homes."Firewall? I guess they didn't prepare the statement enough, but the intent is clear. Still, it seems that the focus is on the consumer's responsibility to lock down their network, ignoring the fact that the equipment that's churned out by manufacturers is far too difficult to secure in the best of circumstances, let alone when you have legacy gear that won't support WPA. Eric seems to agree:
Personally, I keep my home network locked down, and with consumer-grade WAPs so easy to administer, there's really no excuse for leaving them running with the default (open) settings."Easy" is very relative. It's "easy" for guys like us, and probably a lot of the Ars audience, but try standing in the networking hardware aisle at Best Buy for about 15 minutes and listen to the questions most customers ask. As I've touched on before, expecting them to secure their setups is just asking for trouble.