<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optional Client-Side Input Validation That Matches Server-side Validation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cerias.purdue.edu/weblogs/pmeunier/secure-it-practices/post-107/optional-client-side-input-validation-that-matches-server-side-validation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cerias.purdue.edu/weblogs/pmeunier/secure-it-practices/post-107/optional-client-side-input-validation-that-matches-server-side-validation/</link>
	<description>Privacy, Security and Information Assurance issues</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pascal Meunier</title>
		<link>http://www.cerias.purdue.edu/weblogs/pmeunier/secure-it-practices/post-107/optional-client-side-input-validation-that-matches-server-side-validation/#comment-74931</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal Meunier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cerias.purdue.edu/weblogs/pmeunier/secure-it-practices/post-107/optional-client-side-input-validation-that-matches-server-side-validation/#comment-74931</guid>
		<description>Michael,
I wasn't aware of your work.  I'm glad that's available for Rails.  Your plugin sounds easy to use and less work in some cases than what I described, if a little more opaque.  I hope it will be popular.  I think that the central idea of both our designs, changing only the class of the elements, has been validated :;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
I wasn&#8217;t aware of your work.  I&#8217;m glad that&#8217;s available for Rails.  Your plugin sounds easy to use and less work in some cases than what I described, if a little more opaque.  I hope it will be popular.  I think that the central idea of both our designs, changing only the class of the elements, has been validated :;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Schuerig</title>
		<link>http://www.cerias.purdue.edu/weblogs/pmeunier/secure-it-practices/post-107/optional-client-side-input-validation-that-matches-server-side-validation/#comment-71786</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Schuerig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 16:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cerias.purdue.edu/weblogs/pmeunier/secure-it-practices/post-107/optional-client-side-input-validation-that-matches-server-side-validation/#comment-71786</guid>
		<description>I've published a Rails plugin "ages" ago that uses reflection to mirror model-level validation in the browser. For an introduction, see

http://schuerig.de/michael/blog/index.php/2006/12/15/rails-almost-automatic-client-side-validation/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve published a Rails plugin &#8220;ages&#8221; ago that uses reflection to mirror model-level validation in the browser. For an introduction, see</p>
<p><a href="http://schuerig.de/michael/blog/index.php/2006/12/15/rails-almost-automatic-client-side-validation/" rel="nofollow">http://schuerig.de/michael/blog/index.php/2006/12/15/rails-almost-automatic-client-side-validation/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
